[REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

User avatar
Tiny Blondie
Posts: 305
Likes:
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:45 pm

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by Tiny Blondie »   1 likes

Makelover, what are you doing here my friend ? Is there anyone who forced you to come here ? Mind you 100 % of the films shared here are legal. When kids are used (or exploited) by the industry of advertising, journalism, music, sports, name them, does it sound better, or moral ?

Comments about this ?

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_ ... of_War.jpg

Ever heard anyone complaining ? The guy even got a Pulitzer prize… Yet she is naked, yet she is dead suffering in her flesh.
Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta.
User avatar
Sully23
Posts: 1336
Likes:
Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 7:41 pm

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by Sully23 »   0 likes

Tiny Blondie wrote: Ever heard anyone complaining ? The guy even got a Pulitzer prize… Yet she is naked, yet she is dead suffering in her flesh.
Something very horrible also that I saw some time ago was the live broadcast of a hostage taking in a school in Beslan, Russia, not only because that day many children died but some were naked or they were also carrying them to safety.
Makelover wrote:Pretty baby was actually a beautiful love story, it was indeed equally promoting Brooke shields innocence...by making her do those nude scenes.
Brooke did it because the movie required it, because if she rejected the role for being in 'skins' she was surely looking for another actress and even so even another girl would have played her double, and even more so when you contradict 'it's a beautiful love story' but between a girl and an adult who looks like her father, regardless of whether it was fictional and at the beginning of the 20th century. Also these things come from a long time there are many paintings of children or in the same photograph, there is a great difference between art and perversion. In a movie he describes quite everyday situations such as if your parents bathed you with clothes or you went swimming in a lake with clothes or even when you were born with your mother's womb you came out with clothes on.
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

@Makelover or @herlovings, or whoever you pretend to be today, you may not have noticed since you've only been here for MINUTES, that the blatant perversion you accuse me of has been discouraged on FLM for the last DECADE. Again, since you're a complete NOOB, you haven't read my consistent comments about childhood nudity, and you STILL haven't bothered to read the posting guidelines. Conversely, the VERY FIRST thing you did - and are STILL doing - is advertise YOUR perversions. I'm tempted to offer you a box of tissues.

FLM started a long time ago with a focus towards what you're advocating, but changed ownership. Since then, we have NOT been focused that way, but we didn't censor or delete anything prior to that - there are still lots of very good childhood films regardless whether there was nudity or not. We STILL don't censor - you will note YOUR post with its comments and pix was not censored or deleted. nor was your rant with its obvious child's butt fetish. You even created a new user profile, thinking your original was deleted - which it was not. Maybe you were ashamed? People can post without getting reprimanded unless they cross the line, and they can certainly be more discreet - that's what PM's are for.

You got spanked because your attitude is NOT wanted here and other newbies can use your behavior as the example NOT to follow. Most people already know better, but YOU didn't. If you're looking for like-minded perverts, you're in the wrong place and I invite you to look elsewhere. If you want to bitch at me about it then PM me. Either way, you aren't contributing anything to FLM and your opinions will be considered in that light.

You will also note you haven't been banned, even though you baselessly called me a pervert several times. I will say this though - further crap from you WILL get that result.

As far as Brooke Shields' innocence, take that up with her mother who was also her agent. She consistently put her daughter in those commercials, photo shoots, and films, and was always on the sets - nothing was done without her approval. Brooke's naivete had no part in it, her mother sold her daughter's body since she certainly wasn't a good actress, basically whoring her out to the highest bidder. Don't blame me or anyone else here for that.
User avatar
Rich_Visiting
Posts: 852
Likes:
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by Rich_Visiting »   0 likes

Just a rare stop by, but I agree with Phuzzy here and I hope he doesn't mind me chiming in for an old school view. We live in a different time from when this site was created. To run, and for a site to survive these days, a reputable site it must hold to more social standards. Socialisation has generally created a society that tends towards the mainstream, with a significant "witch hunt" mentality on those who deviate (or unintentionally deviate!). With this in mind, it only brings this site into disrepute (and risk) to focus on these things. I do however disagree with the terms "pervert" / "perversions" because, as per Kinsey, sexual attractions are more a multitude of fetishes. The issue is if these attractions cause harm; if they do not then who is one to judge? Further, unlike the society of today (i.e. gay pride etc etc.) I don’t believe that how a person gets off defines who that person is, unless they choose to make that the focus of their life. The good a person does in life should not be outweighed by a sexual attraction that does not affect others. We also cannot understand how a person’s attractions (or perhaps afflictions) came about, or the circumstances for such, again we can only consider how their actions presently affect others. So, I personally would not judge them negatively. However, to post socially unacceptable images on this website - especially for the purpose of a bandwagon validation of one's own attraction - is not acceptable, and they were rightly treated by Phuzzy as such. Just my thoughts.
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

At the time of the changeover, FLM had, shall we say, a less than stellar reputation among like-themed boards because of its focus. One of the first things we did was change directions - all films child-related were on-topic, every age, sex, and genre, and most don't involve child nudity, they're just good films. Not only did our reputation go up, we got a lot of great films we wouldn't have seen before. Films with nudity were still being posted but people didn't make a big deal out of it - the films were here in spite of it, not because of it.

Even so, we didn't remove anything posted before then and we didn't remove the posters' accounts. I try not to judge people unless they force me to like this guy did. I get the impression he's young and overly entitled, like a twelve-year-old getting his first glimpse of a Penthouse magazine (Larry Flynt just died BTW) and wagging his junk like it's supposed to impress us. Too bad since he would have been welcomed otherwise.
User avatar
Rich_Visiting
Posts: 852
Likes:
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by Rich_Visiting »   0 likes

Phuzzy4242 wrote:At the time of the changeover, FLM had, shall we say, a less than stellar reputation among like-themed boards because of its focus. One of the first things we did was change directions - all films child-related were on-topic, every age, sex, and genre, and most don't involve child nudity, they're just good films. Not only did our reputation go up, we got a lot of great films we wouldn't have seen before. Films with nudity were still being posted but people didn't make a big deal out of it - the films were here in spite of it, not because of it.
Hmm I did not know any other boards, I don't suppose I cared so much at the time lol but happy that that reputation is improved now 8-)
Phuzzy4242 wrote:Even so, we didn't remove anything posted before then and we didn't remove the posters' accounts. I try not to judge people unless they force me to like this guy did. I get the impression he's young and overly entitled, like a twelve-year-old getting his first glimpse of a Penthouse magazine (Larry Flynt just died BTW) and wagging his junk like it's supposed to impress us. Too bad since he would have been welcomed otherwise.
Hmm, looking at his post again the guy / woman seems conflicted, difficult to pin an age. Educated, good constructive English. But becomes either excited / shy at describing nudity, probably the latter. So I think you're right that he / she is young and entitled. Good read.
User avatar
sifon773_lover
Posts: 61
Likes:
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2021 6:02 pm

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by sifon773_lover »   1 likes

Omg this is awesome!
“If you can get to be you, why can't I get to be me?”
realmbin

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by realmbin »   0 likes

:heart :icon_1dancingban :heart
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   1 likes

@realmbin, we know what's in the films on FLM - you don't need to post pix highlighting your fetishes, especially since this one has already been posted before.

FLM is NOT about childhood nudity. Films aren't released here because they have nudity but in spite of it.
realmbin

Re: [REL] Pretty Baby (1978)

Post by realmbin »   0 likes

Phuzzy4242.Nanu,nanu.I'm rubber and you are glue,whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!You are only here for one reason, just like all the rest of us.Stop denying the obvious
Locked