[REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
It looks very clean (to clean for my taste). What's wrong with the original? It's film grain and not too much of it.
-
- Posts: 799
- Likes: 369
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:48 am
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
It's not as grainy as HUD, which has really inconsistent grain, is that why you did grain removal on that?
I'd say in the original there's a lot more there than I'd want. But yeah, it's all personal taste. I think there's grain that hides detail and is distracting - and in this film there's a lot of really grainy scenes. At 576/625p this fine grain would be smeared out in the mpeg encoding - so it would never be an issue - but at bluray resolution this has far more than most 1080p's of that era and before - so could do with some cleanup imho.
I know when remastering for bluray most film companies will remove strong grain like this. Look at things like Ep4 Star Wars - Lowry Digital colour corrected and did noise reduction. Topaz gives us some tools to do this at the amateur level.
- pillowbaker
- Posts: 2111
- Likes: 3622
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:05 am
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
There appear to be two different versions of subs for this film on opensubs. Seem pretty close to each other. Here are the few lines from them. If you'd like goku, you can download a small portion and compare subs from the very beginning.
The subs from Night follow this first option:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The subs from Night follow this first option:
Spoiler: |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spoiler: |
Last edited by pillowbaker on Mon Apr 10, 2023 4:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
Apparently Anna Geislerová was born in 1976 which would make her around 15 when it was released.
I drink therefore I am
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
Aaah yes I've seen that comment now, I must have missed it first time round.
I drink therefore I am
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
-
- Posts: 799
- Likes: 369
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:48 am
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
I'm having a go at running it through Topaz to Denoise it... it predicts 2 days 7 hours to finish!
Re: [REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)
Nice! Thanks David! By the way have you considered remastering „La Puce“ (Shortfilm) ? With @deadmans best version (no hardcoded subtitles)David32441 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 7:56 am I'm having a go at running it through Topaz to Denoise it... it predicts 2 days 7 hours to finish!