[REL] Kruh (2001)

E9A7F3bD
Posts: 221
Likes:
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by E9A7F3bD »   0 likes

It's interesting seems that both main actresses seem to have a stunt double?
[Image]
User avatar
Night457
Global Moderator
Posts: 8826
Likes:
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 3:44 pm

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by Night457 »   2 likes

Thank you for the additional screenshots, description, and links.
E9A7F3bD wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 1:05 am I'm not sure it's @ezevex 's source, or it comes from @ezevex.
The file sizes are very close but not exactly consistent.
I have reshared jezevex's file on eMule and on pixeldrain. [Code] File specifications: [Code]
User avatar
ghost
Site Admin
Posts: 11354
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by ghost »   24 likes

After looking at it again, I wasn't satisfied with my watermark removal in 2021.
I did it again with a different method. I also ran it through Topaz Video AI to improve picture quality and minimize compression artifacts:

[Image]

Like this post to see ed2k links  [2.33 GiB]
[Code] You can update if you want.

In addition I translated the Czech subtitles again. What Google (or DeepL? I can't remember) gave me in 2021 wasn't good.
I used DeepSeek this time with some manual corrections.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Night457
Global Moderator
Posts: 8826
Likes:
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 3:44 pm

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by Night457 »   0 likes

ghost wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:46 pm Kruh (2001).1080p.NEW.mkv
Thank you very, very much for the NEW version! :mrgreen:
User avatar
ghost
Site Admin
Posts: 11354
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by ghost »   2 likes

Thank you very, very much for the NEW version! :mrgreen:
I didn't want to confuse you with the same file name. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Unigami
Posts: 446
Likes:
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2024 9:44 pm

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by Unigami »   0 likes

ghost wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:46 pm After looking at it again, I wasn't satisfied with my watermark removal in 2021.
I did it again with a different method. I also ran it through Topaz Video AI to improve picture quality and minimize compression artifacts:
Spoiler:

[Image]

Kruh (2001).1080p.NEW.mkv
[Code] You can update if you want.

In addition I translated the Czech subtitles again. What Google (or DeepL? I can't remember) gave me in 2021 wasn't good.
I used DeepSeek this time with some manual corrections.
You super. Wonderfully. Thank you so much. :)
:!: :?: :idea:[Code]:!: :?: :idea:
E9A7F3bD
Posts: 221
Likes:
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by E9A7F3bD »   0 likes

ghost wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:16 pm I didn't want to confuse you with the same file name. :mrgreen:
Yes, if you could better differentiate versions in filenames in the future it would greatly reduce the pain in my ass.

For example, you could simply use "ghost.v1", "ghost.v2", or "ghost.20210921", "ghost.20250226" in the suffix.

OK, just a joke, thank you for making the new versions. (You are still using the same filename in the subtitles :mrgreen: )
User avatar
ghost
Site Admin
Posts: 11354
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by ghost »   0 likes

You are still using the same filename in the subtitles :mrgreen:
I've heard that there are computers that allow you to rename files. ;)
User avatar
pillowbaker
Posts: 3019
Likes:
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:05 am

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by pillowbaker »   0 likes

Thanks for this new upgrade, ghost. And you're bumping some pretty cool stuff, E9A7F3bD. Can I call you E9?
E9A7F3bD
Posts: 221
Likes:
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)

Post by E9A7F3bD »   0 likes

pillowbaker wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 12:26 am E9A7F3bD. Can I call you E9?
You may call me by any name you wish.

But make sure you know that I will only be notified and see your comments if you "quote reply" me.
Post Reply