Censorship
Re: Censorship
This thread runs into an...errh...interesting direction... 
Re: Censorship
Officer replies: "A toupee resembling pubic hair was recover from the wall directly over her bed.... How do you explain that?"kev wrote:(But HEY, from your point of view you could always try it as support for your argument: "Officer, I SWEAR I thought she was old enough: I mean, geeze, she had HAIR down there...")
kev.
[Image]
Re: Censorship
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
now im going to downloading this shit!!!!!!!!! thank you and you da man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

now im going to downloading this shit!!!!!!!!! thank you and you da man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Censorship
Amadeus wrote: [Image]
You made mistake: it's idler portrait. Look his brain, it's burned. Now I know why he post so many nonsense.
Re: Censorship
Ease it a bit, nosey...redcat wrote:You made mistake: it's idler portrait. Look his brain, it's burned. Now I know why he post so many nonsense.
Re: Censorship
emuler wrote:LOL Love these personal attacks.
Actually I'm not too fired up about them.
I know that in any forum where you gather a diverse group of people you're going to have personalities that clash. We need to be civil about our disagreements, though: Direct name-calling [flaming] isn't allowed on THIS board.
I also know that lately I've even made sarcastic posts aimed at people that I've been irritated with, but I don't point blank insult them or demean them. At least I've never intended to with whatever I've said.
If you're REALLY upset with something someone has said, take it up with them in a PM. If you feel it gets out of hand, or feel threatened, let an admin/mod know by PM. We won't have any problem banning someone we feel won't respect the policies of this board as well as it's other members.
Actually I was a member of AANR - American Association of Nude Recreation: [ http://www.aanr.com/ ], but had to let my membership lapse due to cash flow...
kev.
Re: Censorship
Not one drop of malice or malicious intent in this thread, I assure you.kev wrote:emuler wrote:LOL Love these personal attacks.
Actually I'm not too fired up about them.
I know that in any forum where you gather a diverse group of people you're going to have personalities that clash. We need to be civil about our disagreements, though: Direct name-calling [flaming] isn't allowed on THIS board.
I also know that lately I've even made sarcastic posts aimed at people that I've been irritated with, but I don't point blank insult them or demean them. At least I've never intended to with whatever I've said.
If you're REALLY upset with something someone has said, take it up with them in a PM. If you feel it gets out of hand, or feel threatened, let an admin/mod know by PM. We won't have any problem banning someone we feel won't respect the policies of this board as well as it's other members.
kev.
Re: Censorship
Amadeus wrote:...Not one drop of malice or malicious intent in this thread, I assure you.
If you think I'm referring to your post or anything aimed at me, you're mistaken.
However if you check post #211, you'll find a rather caustic jab at another member. In realm of THIS thread the remark was completely unwarranted, although the two members HAVE locked horns in other threads. There is a bit more than a 'drop of malice' there.
The member who was referred to made a restrained post in return. From the admin's point of view that was very appreciated.
Still, something needs to be done about the animosity between these and other members.
kev.
Re: Censorship
I think that's not the Boznia peace conference but just the world wide web. redcat made a joke and I'm not going to strangle him. It's like boxing: if you let him have it all, you have to to take what you get back.kev wrote:Still, something needs to be done about the animosity between these and other members. kev.