I'm not sure what you're asking.
Of course I took the time to grab all the information I needed to include.
All pictures are original files and are not reprocessed. (It might be faster if use webp)
All content is self-hosted and is not affected by the original website.
At the same time, it is a one-time crawl and will not be updated with the original website.
Is it possible to keep it updated? Of course there is, but I can't see a reason to do that.
It's just a quick demonstration, it took me less than a day and wasn't within my expectations.
According to the introduction of the suite website it can handle millions of entries, I haven't tried that many, but I can say it remains efficient in tens of thousands. I've said before that there are some mature solutions out there, you could see a lot of other features and demonstrations.Handle millions of rows, and thousands of updates per second out of the box, without compromising on performance
There are a few features that may not be as intuitive, but they are there, such as the ability to click on multiple column headers with the "shift" key, which gives you a mixed sorting result. You can drag the columns to any position and size you want. etc.
I don't have the time to do all the optimizations and fine-tuning, it just achieves the effect I want and is enough to make a presentation for you.
I didn't have to spend a couple of movies time doing this, but I made it with little only interest and want to show you that what I have say is true, and mostly want you to experience them yourself.
My suggestions and expectations for FLM are likewise just that, to be able to make the experience of browsing and retrieving movies better for everyone and for myself.