FirstLoveMovies

As much as I liked this film, I feel it might qualify for the verified off topic label. The girls have limited screen time.

[Image] [Image]

Nasuada wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 8:45 pm Even if the film is in my eyes rather the weakest and most convoluted that was made with Daniel Craig,

Perhaps that's why it's the only Bond film I won't watch, since I don't consider it part of the saga. Never Say Never Again seems like just another Bond film compared to this film. I don't blame them for the "Bond little girls." It's perhaps one of the most unusual things I thought we'd never see in this saga.

- Sex and nudity were more explicit. Sophie Marceau is one of the few who showed more skin, especially if Ana de Armas stars in it.

- Bond's family life. I could understand Bond being an assassin, then when they eliminate him, another agent who takes his name replaces him. I would have liked Bond to return to Madeline and his daughter, so that it would be more believable, like spies in real life, perhaps becoming heads of state.

- Children in history. I've seen action movies where children are central to the plot, like Alyssa Milano in Commando. It would be a milestone if another Bond film were posted on FLM, without OT or sensitive content.

I hope the next film, 'Bond Will Return,' is like before, and if for some reason, Daniel Craig Will Return at least corrects that story.

Sully23 wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 5:52 pm...I hope the next film, 'Bond Will Return,' is like before...

James Bond is a psychopath. He wouldn't have emotional baggage the way they depict him in these movies.

Casino Royale is the best of the Daniel Craig run. Quantum of Solace wasn't that great but I don't think it deserves the flack it gets. Skyfall was alright. Last two were trash. (His little French daughter is cute though)

Children are not to blame if a movie is bad even if they are bad at acting.