FirstLoveMovies

than; yiu

[Code] Before/After: [Code] Context: https://www.first-loves.com/forums/view ... hp?t=16698

thecyanray wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 12:35 pm [Code] Before/After: [Code] Context: https://www.first-loves.com/forums/view ... hp?t=16698

So is it just this clip?

thevelvet wrote:

Yes, because it would quickly get expensive. Would cost over one thousand dollars for the whole film, I'm not paying that for one film. Only way that could currently happen right now is if members decide to pool money for this, but there wouldn't even be interest anyway as ghost's current enhancement is of satisfactory quality. Wait a couple years and the only cost will be electricity consumption from running it locally - probably for an even better result than now!

thecyanray wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 10:47 pm Yes, because it would quickly get expensive. Would cost over one thousand dollars for the whole film,

I am really impressed and you did a good job, but you are quite right there would be no interest in some members, if I would choose between a 1min clip and the full movie, I choose the clip almost similarly on childrenincinema where the clips are free to download and the full movie on premium download.

thecyanray wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 10:47 pm but there wouldn't even be interest anyway as ghost's current enhancement is of satisfactory quality.

I don't think this film is of much interest because although it hasn't had any changes in its format, its quality is incredibly good in relation to other films that do deserve restoration because its quality is still crap and also in 3 countries it is considered a CP and the repercussions would be in other countries that would take the same measures (only if they edit the polemic scenes) the distribution would be illegal.

...and you did a good job

Starlight did the job.

Just wondering: If this is a child pornography, why didn't they put the director and the producer in jail and destroy all the copies, instead of just blocking it from being shown?

That movie should have ended the careers of all, but Lara Wendel continued to do similar roles, even with much older actors.

Eva Ionesco said that "she was forced to play in this film", because her mother was in a relationship with the director.

Am I the only one who finds those super-weird?

voyagerabba wrote: Tue Jun 17, 2025 10:31 am Just wondering: If this is a child pornography, why didn't they put the director and the producer in jail and destroy all the copies, instead of just blocking it from being shown?

They would be in jail if it was done today, it was 50 years ago, there were no regulations, they were children and couldn't do anything, like the case of Adele Haenel, the director took advantage of her and that happened in 2001 but even so there was no supervision because no one protected the actress or what happened on the set of Icarly where Jerry Trainor protected the children from the producer, but let's go back to the 70s, similarly Eva didn't know what was being filmed and later interviews saying she didn't like it because if a child does bad things to him and tells someone, but they don't believe him even with the parents' approval.

Do you understand the difference

voyagerabba wrote: Tue Jun 17, 2025 10:31 am Just wondering: If this is a child pornography, why didn't they put the director and the producer in jail and destroy all the copies, instead of just blocking it from being shown?

That movie should have ended the careers of all, but Lara Wendel continued to do similar roles, even with much older actors.

Eva Ionesco said that "she was forced to play in this film", because her mother was in a relationship with the director.

Am I the only one who finds those super-weird?

It’s almost never that black & white or simple.

As Sully already said: different times = different laws, different „morals“. We’re talking about a time when you could still bear your wife or kids legally and women in many countries still had far less rights.

Also, The Film got outlawed in countries like Germany some years after the initial release if I remember correctly?

You could argue it’s CP done under the disguise of a fiction/drama cinema movie. Imho The film is so „dirty“ because it focus way too long & too much on genitals etc.

Remember some argued (in Netherlands I think) that „Het Debuut“ or „Schatjes“ are also CP due to the sex scenes with 16yo actresses.

Also interesting how we haven’t gotten a proper release of that Argentinian film where the actresses had long lesbian sex scene.

Sully23 wrote: Tue Jun 17, 2025 4:12 pm They would be in jail if it was done today, it was 50 years ago, there were no regulations, they were children and couldn't do anything, like the case of Adele Haenel, the director took advantage of her and that happened in 2001 but even so there was no supervision because no one protected the actress or what happened on the set of Icarly where Jerry Trainor protected the children from the producer, but let's go back to the 70s, similarly Eva didn't know what was being filmed and later interviews saying she didn't like it because if a child does bad things to him and tells someone, but they don't believe him even with the parents' approval.
Do you understand the difference

Director Murgia shot the film in Austria to bypass Italian censorship, so the rules were in place back then as well, but not everywhere. The film also faced heavy criticism upon its release. Here is the headline from Corriere della Sera (Italy's main newspaper): 'In the film of shame, two twelve-year-old porn stars'.
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1681/253 ... 96f0_o.jpg