It's interesting seems that both main actresses seem to have a stunt double?
[Image]
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2025 1:22 pm
by Night457
Thank you for the additional screenshots, description, and links.
E9A7F3bD wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 1:05 am
I'm not sure it's @ezevex 's source, or it comes from @ezevex.
The file sizes are very close but not exactly consistent.
I have reshared jezevex's file on eMule and on pixeldrain.
[Code]
File specifications:
[Code]
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:46 pm
by ghost
After looking at it again, I wasn't satisfied with my watermark removal in 2021.
I did it again with a different method. I also ran it through Topaz Video AI to improve picture quality and minimize compression artifacts:
In addition I translated the Czech subtitles again. What Google (or DeepL? I can't remember) gave me in 2021 wasn't good.
I used DeepSeek this time with some manual corrections.
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:07 pm
by Night457
ghost wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:46 pm
Kruh (2001).1080p.NEW.mkv
Thank you very, very much for the NEW version!
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:16 pm
by ghost
Thank you very, very much for the NEW version!
I didn't want to confuse you with the same file name.
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 8:19 pm
by Unigami
ghost wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:46 pm
After looking at it again, I wasn't satisfied with my watermark removal in 2021.
I did it again with a different method. I also ran it through Topaz Video AI to improve picture quality and minimize compression artifacts:
Spoiler:
[Image]
Kruh (2001).1080p.NEW.mkv
[Code]
You can update if you want.
In addition I translated the Czech subtitles again. What Google (or DeepL? I can't remember) gave me in 2021 wasn't good.
I used DeepSeek this time with some manual corrections.
You super. Wonderfully. Thank you so much.
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 10:37 pm
by E9A7F3bD
ghost wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:16 pm
I didn't want to confuse you with the same file name.
Yes, if you could better differentiate versions in filenames in the future it would greatly reduce the pain in my ass.
For example, you could simply use "ghost.v1", "ghost.v2", or "ghost.20210921", "ghost.20250226" in the suffix.
OK, just a joke, thank you for making the new versions. (You are still using the same filename in the subtitles )
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 11:24 pm
by ghost
You are still using the same filename in the subtitles
I've heard that there are computers that allow you to rename files.
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2025 12:26 am
by pillowbaker
Thanks for this new upgrade, ghost. And you're bumping some pretty cool stuff, E9A7F3bD. Can I call you E9?
Re: [REL] Kruh (2001)
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:02 am
by E9A7F3bD
pillowbaker wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 12:26 am
E9A7F3bD. Can I call you E9?
You may call me by any name you wish.
But make sure you know that I will only be notified and see your comments if you "quote reply" me.