Page 4 of 9
Re: TAC
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2021 9:16 pm
by Triela
Amadeus wrote:It's not a matter of reliability, but history. I assume everyone here takes every precaution not to link themselves to sights that could potentially harm them or the forum... Just the idea that it is a research link (which leads to the idea of child porn), automatically makes me think your link may be part of the research. And when I think of the terms research and child pornography, I think of government.
....REALLY wonder how you appreciate the fact that many of these movies can be found on the most generalistic-ish of video sites, won't name names...like, you know, the most notorious IMHO, of these, the Lara&Eva one, is there, totally uncensored... ?
Not to mention all those series from Lederhosen Land.
Re: TAC
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 9:40 am
by taclink
Can anyone provide a link to the latest tac? or any version of tac?
Re: TAC
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2022 8:14 am
by Ziggy Plock
Triela wrote:Rich_Visiting wrote:
Why you bringing up TAC with a poverty TATU image? Which quite frankly is an insult to the genius of TATU? I don't get it.
it's teans, even
I appreciate them. Plus, image has been censored. Don't see the prob...
PS... otoh, they might not have been teans in that pic. but they were when start.
My, my, my, isn't everyone overly sensitive....
also, "genius" ??? They're russians, no genius there, just fake lesbian marketing ploys....
also, isn't
TaC perfect for this site, since teens are too...
appreciated here? no need to get
snobbish... imho
Re: TAC
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2022 4:03 pm
by Ziggy Plock
chans123 wrote:I find the info of clip#7.... It is from a movie called "La Rage Au Coeur".
The girl in this clip is Sarah-Laure Estragnat. BTW, I wouldn't find this info without reading the new edition of TAC.
All the same, it falsely claims that Linda Regan is born in 5-11-1959, while she's 10 years older, in all actuality.
Re: TAC
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2022 9:34 pm
by karmykel2
TAC corrects errors that are brought to attention.
Re: TAC
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 6:37 am
by Ziggy Plock
karmykel2 wrote:TAC corrects errors that are brought to attention.
Look, there's no bigger fan of TAC on these boards than I, but brought to attention, like .... how? This claim has been there at least since the 12th edition in 2010...
Re: TAC
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 8:59 am
by karmykel2
But you have to understand that years ago other sites that seemed reliable listed incorrect 1959 birthdates for Linda Regan, instead of 1949 as they do today
Re: TAC
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2022 10:56 am
by Ziggy Plock
karmykel2 wrote:But you have to understand that years ago other sites that seemed reliable listed incorrect 1959 birthdates for Linda Regan, instead of 1949 as they do today
Not really the point. The point is that the mistake is STILL there, has been for twelve years and at least 10 or 11 new editions.
Which negates your remark that the TAC corrects errors. This is a biggie, IMHO. But on that particular one, YMMV.
Still, it's a great resource, there's a lot of work, and everyone can think what they want about their stances, pleas, calls or whatever you wanna call it, but it's a very extensive piece of labor, with an unparalleled scope, right there.....

Re: TAC
Posted: Sun May 01, 2022 1:14 pm
by karmykel2
Linda Regan was deleted today from all locations in TAC's master file, so she will not appear in subsequent revisions.
Re: TAC
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2023 10:08 am
by reptile12
Here are some actresses I found might be relevant to TAC:
Silje Hagrim Dahl in Reckless:
[Image]
Martine Johansen in Varg Veum: Skriften Paa Veggen:
[Image]
(Maybe) Leelee Sobieski in Uprising (born 1983 June, shooting in march, not sure how long):
[Image]
Ana de Armas in Madrigal (?):
[Image]