FirstLoveMovies

This is only a suppose but...i think RFF is a site administrated by one of us...
The thing that can do this mind is... this

http://rarefilmfinder.com/showfilm.php?id=44117

After my release REQ of the same movie here...

I've never seen this movie never seen on RFF and in fact in my post i've say....Not listed at RFF and....BANG now is appeared on RFF.

It's a case?

...reply

Cya all

Probably not because there are lots of films at RFF that are not on FLM. That doesn't mean RFF doesn't scan us for new stuff. The major search engines index us - Google, Yahoo, Bing, and others. We look at other sites for their new films, so it makes sense for them to look at us.

They look at us for damn sure. I have been more then flattered that after I started posting they opened sister site Children In Media. And, up until recently, within a short period, posts all my music posts. I loved that we had a symbiotic relationship as it helps to spread the music. I don't mind doing the legwork on info.

They have yet to fix the "Butterfly Room" keyword. No-one here has proven nips. I did not see them. Topless should not be a keyword. BUUUTTTTT...I have not pointed it out to them directly cause it is an awesome movie that I would not have seen if not being misdirected by that keyword.

Isn't it logical that most RFF members, at least the girl-oriented ones, keep an eye on FLM

Phuzzy4242 wrote:Probably not because there are lots of films at RFF that are not on FLM. That doesn't mean RFF doesn't scan us for new stuff. The major search engines index us - Google, Yahoo, Bing, and others. We look at other sites for their new films, so it makes sense for them to look at us.

RFF is not an archive of movie they describe childhood movies with keywords...ok movies on RFF are not here that doen't mean that they have the movie btw they would to provide to find them...

donkeykog wrote:They look at us for damn sure. I have been more then flattered that after I started posting they opened sister site Children In Media. And, up until recently, within a short period, posts all my music posts. I loved that we had a symbiotic relationship as it helps to spread the music. I don't mind doing the legwork on info.

They have yet to fix the "Butterfly Room" keyword. No-one here has proven nips. I did not see them. Topless should not be a keyword. BUUUTTTTT...I have not pointed it out to them directly cause it is an awesome movie that I would not have seen if not being misdirected by that keyword.

Yeah i am agree with you...for example for the movie INCOMPRESA they says Brief slip of Giulia Salerno's (11) breast in one scene.

So i've checked frame to frame all entirely movie but i don't seen the scene mentioned....this is 1st example but there is more to talk about...

I think they use topless keywords to mean, sometimes that one girl in topless but she is in rear pose respect the camera...so the girl is in topless or shirtless but don't seen nothing...

I've opened this thread cause i've suspects for far time ago...since i was a member and after my admin status here.

Also i thinking which members can do that...but is only a suppose like my thread....

Starting to distrust RFF for info.

The last two movies I have seen and spent money buying (not including the Butterfly Room), Tosepiger and Seven Invisible Men, have full frontal as a controversial scene. In both, the scenes are so quick and in SIM so dark, that nothing is seen. If nothing is seen it doesn't count and there is no amount of slow pause that changes that. RFF is starting to be like one of those magazines that sell itself by claiming a "nude" celebrity and then when you buy it, shes turned to the side with her hands over her tits. Technically she is nude. But why the hell did I buy this?

In the case of Tosepiger, I did try to inform others through the comments that the full nudity portion of the contr. scene was bogus as nothing could be scene and my comment was taken down and nothing changed.

donkeykog wrote:Starting to distrust RFF for info.

The last two movies I have seen and spent money buying (not including the Butterfly Room), Tosepiger and Seven Invisible Men, have full frontal as a controversial scene. In both, the scenes are so quick and in SIM so dark, that nothing is seen. If nothing is seen it doesn't count and there is no amount of slow pause that changes that. RFF is starting to be like one of those magazines that sell itself by claiming a "nude" celebrity and then when you buy it, shes turned to the side with her hands over her tits. Technically she is nude. But why the hell did I buy this?

In the case of Tosepiger, I did try to inform others through the comments that the full nudity portion of the contr. scene was bogus as nothing could be scene and my comment was taken down and nothing changed.

I agree...another expample...in some movies they've included the word...topless or nude and then unverified!!!

WHAT? UNVERIFIED and why you've wrote topless or nude?????