[REL] Lucy (2003)
Re: [REQ] Lucy (2003)
Is it a short or is it a home video?
On the owner's video channel showing videos of her artwork
On the owner's video channel showing videos of her artwork
Re: [REQ] Lucy (2003)
Looks like aeome "art work". No IMDB entry.
Anyway, thanks fot finding!
Anyway, thanks fot finding!
- Phuzzy4242
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7686
- Likes: 26728
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am
Re: [REQ] Lucy (2003)
The "artist" sure seems to have a high opinion of herself - she's naked in nearly every one of her films, and she's not exactly good-looking. I guess I'm not sophisticated enough to appreciate this kind of artsy fartsy stuff.
Like this post to see ed2k links [25.69 Mb]
Like this post to see ed2k links [25.69 Mb]
Re: [REL] Lucy (2003)
lol
this really is high art though
i love art!
this really is high art though
i love art!
Re: [REL] Lucy (2003)
I hope everyone thinks like you and the artistreptile12 wrote:lol
this really is high art though
i love art!
- Phuzzy4242
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7686
- Likes: 26728
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am
Re: [REL] Lucy (2003)
This film was the ONLY one on that Vimeo page that was bearable to watch for more than 10 seconds. It didn't matter what the subject of her film was supposed to be, this one is the only one that didn't have her posing naked in it as if that somehow made it worth watching. Maybe she thought a naked woman was the only thing that would make someone waste their time.reptile12 wrote:lol
this really is high art though
i love art!
Anyway, thanks reptile12.
Re: [REL] Lucy (2003)
Removed from Vimeo.
Re: [REL] Lucy (2003)
It is still on eMule, at least. Does anyone have any filmmaker info? It has no credits, and with the "artist" disappeared from VimeUhOh I am at a loss.