TAC
TAC
Found it on other site - A very useful article for for research proposal.
Update: the older version was deleted; please download the newer version in my newer post in this thread.
Warning: This article is just for research proposal; please don't see child porn in anytime soon.
Update: the older version was deleted; please download the newer version in my newer post in this thread.
Warning: This article is just for research proposal; please don't see child porn in anytime soon.
Re: TAC
OK, would you mind posting the articles content here. Your link is to a direct download and site I am unfamiliar.
Re: TAC
Too long to post here. And since when did unknown and/or dodgy sites become such a concern of yours? You have posted plenty of them in the past.
Here's the same file at a well-known site.
http://rapidshare.de/files/41217045/up00225.zip.html
Here's the same file at a well-known site.
Re: TAC
Well, let's see.... A member has 16 posts to show in 2 1/2 years. Then posts a research link (?) which may or may not be linked to child pornography.FLL wrote:Too long to post here. And since when did unknown and/or dodgy sites become such a concern of yours? You have posted plenty of them in the past.
Here's the same file at a well-known site.
http://rapidshare.de/files/41217045/up00225.zip.html
Shall I go on...
Re: TAC
Thank you very much, FLL.
Amadeus, some parts of this article are related to child porn, but the article itself isn't a child porn, and many other parts of this article are definitely on-topic ; if you think that I'm unreliable, you can use FLL's link to download this article.
Again: This article is just for research proposal; please don't see child porn in anytime soon.
Amadeus, some parts of this article are related to child porn, but the article itself isn't a child porn, and many other parts of this article are definitely on-topic ; if you think that I'm unreliable, you can use FLL's link to download this article.
Again: This article is just for research proposal; please don't see child porn in anytime soon.
- ptguardian
- Posts: 4479
- Likes: 12862
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:00 am
Re: TAC
i found the same text file on russian forum recently. good resource guide.
Like this post to see ed2k links [828.1 Kb]
safe
but always good to be careful
Like this post to see ed2k links [828.1 Kb]
safe
but always good to be careful
Re: TAC
It's not a matter of reliability, but history. I assume everyone here takes every precaution not to link themselves to sights that could potentially harm them or the forum... Just the idea that it is a research link (which leads to the idea of child porn), automatically makes me think your link may be part of the research. And when I think of the terms research and child pornography, I think of government.chans123 wrote:Thank you very much, FLL.
Amadeus, some parts of this article are related to child porn, but the article itself isn't a child porn, and many other parts of this article are definitely on-topic ; if you think that I'm unreliable, you can use FLL's link to download this article.
Again: This article is just for research proposal; please don't see child porn in anytime soon.
- ptguardian
- Posts: 4479
- Likes: 12862
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:00 am
Re: TAC
i think Amadeus makes a great point.the original poster should have chosen their words more carefully. but as having the text myself and scanning it over. it is just a list of actresses giving age and in what movie. it does list a few movies not safe for downloading, but thats the down loaders problem if they try to go for that crap. as for 15 percent of this very large list it is on topic.
Amadeus is right.reputation goes a long way.earning trust is hard to do here. and with good reason.
Amadeus is right.reputation goes a long way.earning trust is hard to do here. and with good reason.
Re: TAC
Here is the newly updated esition of TAC (created on 1/14/2009.)
Update: the older version was deleted; please download the newer version in my newer post in this thread.
Update: the older version was deleted; please download the newer version in my newer post in this thread.
- ptguardian
- Posts: 4479
- Likes: 12862
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:00 am
Re: TAC
this list is good information but to hard to read. it would be nice to have a cut list with just what is on topic. the list is so long it is hard to sort out the good from the crap. but still a good reference sheet. thanks