[Image]
Director: Jan Jakub Kolski
sorces info: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0357037/
[Image]
RMVB
[Code]
or CD
[Code]
(sorry no edk link)
[REL] Pornografia (2003)
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
Oh dear.........wait for it...........agubugugu wrote: (sorry no edk link)
-
Debaser
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
Post
by Debaser »
0 likes
<moved>
Hi agubugugu
This needs an ed2k link to be an official release, but at least you left out the REL tag in the title.
Obviously your effort is appreciated, but not using an ed2k link will...... well its been discussed here enough times so lets not get into that debate again
Once the link is added to this thread, it can be moved back to the release section
Them be the rules
Thank you
Hi agubugugu
This needs an ed2k link to be an official release, but at least you left out the REL tag in the title.
Obviously your effort is appreciated, but not using an ed2k link will...... well its been discussed here enough times so lets not get into that debate again
Once the link is added to this thread, it can be moved back to the release section
Them be the rules
Thank you
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
Sigh.Debaser wrote:This needs an ed2k link to be an official release
Like this post to see ed2k links [1.29 GiB] Like this post to see ed2k links [699.52 MiB] Like this post to see ed2k links [623.02 MiB] Like this post to see ed2k links [620.94 MiB] Like this post to see ed2k links [681.76 MiB] Like this post to see ed2k links [672.79 MiB] Like this post to see ed2k links [639.06 MiB]Well, you asked for it!
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
I might add... Rapidshare no longer has an hour waiting period. So if you want it today... Download at will.
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
I can't confirm that. My DL was just interrupted, and now I have to wait ten min to start again...Amadeus wrote:I might add... Rapidshare no longer has a clock or waiting period. So if you want it today... Download at will.
-
Debaser
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
Post
by Debaser »
0 likes
Well yes, because that’s what is requiredWell, you asked for it!
We know how to search eMule, but it would have been nice for agubugugu to have a go first.
But I guess you are the hero of the day
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
idler wrote:I can't confirm that. My DL was just interrupted, and now I have to wait ten min to start again...Amadeus wrote:I might add... Rapidshare no longer has a clock or waiting period. So if you want it today... Download at will.
Oh, guess there's a short wait now. 15minutes between files.
Beautiful thing.. Torpark.
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
So you verified all those, right? In general... board etiquette (may even be in the rules, not certain) says if you are posting an unconfirmed link it should be identified as such, and isn't a release until it's confirmed. There's a good chance some of those are fakes or don't have complete sources.idler wrote:Sigh.Debaser wrote:This needs an ed2k link to be an official release
Well, you asked for it!
But the links with a site name can at least be confirmed by simply going to the site and verifying the links are what's posted there, that's usually good enough. I checked the osloskop.net and eMulek.com.pl links and they are good. Sometimes you find subs or other info when you do that, though none in this case.
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
I needed just 3 hours to dl the eMulek version:
Video: XVID 608x256 25.00fps 705Kbps [Video 0]
Audio: MPEG Audio Layer 3 48000Hz stereo 150Kbps [Audio 1]
so it's not HDTV, but it's ok.
I'll probably need ages for the 1.29 mb version since there is only 1 source which is seldom online. Don't know wether it's worth the result...
Like this post to see ed2k links [620.94 MiB]
Like this post to see ed2k links [620.94 MiB]
are the same file with - for some reason - a different hash; I deleted one of the links.
Etc...etc...bla...bla...
I want to make clear that this is not my release!
I'm glad to inform you that there is no board rule whatsoever about "confirmation" of ed2k-links. That would have been a bit strange anyway because even Rich posted fake links sometimes.
I thank you for telling me what is, in your opinion, the board etiquette. Wonder how I got along the last 4 1/2 years on this board.
Thank you for your attention.
Any admin please delete the "moved" post?
Video: XVID 608x256 25.00fps 705Kbps [Video 0]
Audio: MPEG Audio Layer 3 48000Hz stereo 150Kbps [Audio 1]
so it's not HDTV, but it's ok.
I'll probably need ages for the 1.29 mb version since there is only 1 source which is seldom online. Don't know wether it's worth the result...
Like this post to see ed2k links [620.94 MiB] Like this post to see ed2k links [620.94 MiB]are the same file with - for some reason - a different hash; I deleted one of the links.
Etc...etc...bla...bla...
I want to make clear that this is not my release!
I'm glad to inform you that there is no board rule whatsoever about "confirmation" of ed2k-links. That would have been a bit strange anyway because even Rich posted fake links sometimes.
I thank you for telling me what is, in your opinion, the board etiquette. Wonder how I got along the last 4 1/2 years on this board.
Thank you for your attention.
Any admin please delete the "moved" post?