[REL] Soft Like Me (1996) short Canada

User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Soft Like Me (1996) [Short]

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   13 likes

Rich's link hasn't had a full source since I started it. I'm also downloading from the link below which does have a full source, and is viewable (at least previewing it works fine), but it hasn't completed so I don't know if it's OK - it's much smaller than Rich's. It's moving slowly, but had a full source just two hours ago, so I'll keep after it and keep it shared if/when it completes.

Like this post to see ed2k links  [126.97 MiB]

Edit 04/12/2010
Verified complete and 100% viewable, though hardly watchable. I'll keep it shared for awhile, but it's definitely not a keeper for me because it's almost entirely boys, and the subject matter is disgusting - torture, slavery, cannibalism, underage homosexual sex, and murder. Ugh.

I don't know why an aspiring director would think any of these topics would help advance their career and many reasons to believe they'd cause it to crash and burn before it got started. Must be trying for shock factor. :think
Pranama
Posts: 167
Likes:
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Soft Like Me (1996) [Short]

Post by Pranama »   0 likes

Thx Phuzzy :)
satgek
Posts: 27
Likes:
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Soft Like Me (1996) [Short]

Post by satgek »   0 likes

Thx Phuzzy
FLL
Posts: 2191
Likes:
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Soft Like Me (1996) [Short]

Post by FLL »   0 likes

Because Phuzzy edited his post 8 days later, most people including me didn't see that his link was verified (edits don't show up in the new post list, you have to be specifically looking at the thread to notice it). So this never got moved to REL, until now.

By the way, Rich's link did complete for me but I marked it as a "Bad Encode".
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Soft Like Me (1996) [Short]

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

FLL wrote:Because Phuzzy edited his post 8 days later, most people including me didn't see that his link was verified (edits don't show up in the new post list, you have to be specifically looking at the thread to notice it). So this never got moved to REL, until now.

By the way, Rich's link did complete for me but I marked it as a "Bad Encode".
I forget whether this is in my share folder or not - I didn't intend to keep it at all and I know I never burned it to disc - but I assume it's still there or satgek wouldn't be thanking me for it. If so, it won't be there for long so (assuming there are no other sources) get it soon if you really want it after having it described to you. IMHO it's a disgusting piece of trash that would have been better off never filmed.
Post Reply