[REL] Baby (2001) short [UK]

User avatar
LewisCarroll
Posts: 86
Likes:
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:00 am

[REL] Baby (2001) short [UK]

Post by LewisCarroll »   0 likes

User avatar
ptguardian
Posts: 4479
Likes:
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:00 am

Re: [REQ] Baby (2001)

Post by ptguardian »   111 likes

Looks like a short about a teen boy(looks over 16) until near the end when a nice surprise pops up. :cool

Like this post to see ed2k links  [58.35 MiB]

enjoy

It is on-topic. No screen shots to spoil any surprises. ;)
User avatar
ARTHORIUS
Posts: 3719
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Baby (2001)

Post by ARTHORIUS »   0 likes

From 11 jan no replies? i think the surprise not kile to anyone :(
ONE RING TO BRING EM ALL
User avatar
emuler
Posts: 4629
Likes:
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Baby (2001)

Post by emuler »   0 likes

I like surprises. Click. :)
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Baby (2001)

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

bob the moo on IMDb wrote:A teenage boy finds all around him has sexual overtones as he lives a teenage life of drugs and masturbation.

Not quite sure what the point was here. Is this based on the directors experiences? If so then why didn't it have more detail or direction to it. Instead we have a 10 minute w**k. The main character lies on his bed taking hits from his bong and thinking over things such as men and women's bodies at the pool etc while he…..well…..gets off.

And that's it! Some parts seem to hint at deeper meaning but none deliver it. The only clever bit is the title sequence that focus on a stomach making us think this is about a real baby only to pull down to the boy's underwear. However after this it's just the dull fantasies of a teenage boy.

The lead is good but he doesn't have much to do. Overall this is interesting but it never gets deeper than that. If you want to see everyday things come into a boy's sexual fantasizes then it's worth a watch.
That kind of sums it up. Other than about 15 seconds of 'surprise', there isn't much to this film.
User avatar
starfish21
Posts: 3374
Likes:
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Baby (2001)

Post by starfish21 »   0 likes

with a running time of 11.41I think this should ikely be in the shorts section.
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Baby (2001) short [UK]

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

Probably isn't the only one I missed.
User avatar
starfish21
Posts: 3374
Likes:
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Baby (2001) short [UK]

Post by starfish21 »   0 likes

Sorry for giving you extra work,but i'm still going through all my unread posts. :roll:
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Baby (2001) short [UK]

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

No, I don't mind at all. Everything helps.
Goldberger
Posts: 25
Likes:
Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 3:57 pm

Re: [REL] Baby (2001) short [UK]

Post by Goldberger »   1 likes

Post Reply