I know Especially Americans love to put a lot of weight on someone turning 18 and suddenly be „of age“ etc. but yeah imho there’s not much difference between the actress being 17,5yo or 18yo.ghost wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:55 pm Thanks for your research, deadman.
So I guessed right. At first glance, she really did look 18 to me. Maybe she might have been 17 when shooting, but Off-Topic for FLM.
Anyway, thanks for finding the movie, Alex.
[REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
Re: [REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
Re: [REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
Hm.. I always thought FLM criteria is the age of the character in the films? Like if the actress is 20yo but plays and looks like a 14yo it’s considered OT ?ghost wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:43 pmThe criteria is the age of the actress. She's 18 and has big boobs like 25yo.the character was 16 even if the actress is a bit older.
Although it might be a nice short.
Re: [REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
Thanks Alex to bring our attention to this film! Finding new (or old) pieces is why I continue to come back to flm.Alex_kaplan wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:07 am Well, I'd argue about the size of the breasts (There are high school girls with 2-3 bust size and look older, each has its own parameters)![]()
Yes thanks Ghost for helping me download it and thanks Night457 for the subtitles, I don't care where it will be in which forum thread![]()
Re: [REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
Off-Topic:Night457 wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:05 pm Her photographed images in the film were absurdly referred to by the characters as "child porn" (they were not, although moral crusaders have a hard time making that distinction), so the makers of THIS film just might have chosen an 18-year-old so they would be safe from that accusation being made against them.
Spoiler: |
- Alex_kaplan
- Posts: 617
- Likes: 321
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:19 pm
Re: [REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
But there are many such movies, where actresses play the role of schoolgirls, but in reality they are 18-20 or even moregoku33 wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:47 amHm.. I always thought FLM criteria is the age of the character in the films? Like if the actress is 20yo but plays and looks like a 14yo it’s considered OT ?ghost wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:43 pmThe criteria is the age of the actress. She's 18 and has big boobs like 25yo.the character was 16 even if the actress is a bit older.
Although it might be a nice short.
Re: [REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
FLM has always been a forum where we share movies with child actors. By the meaning of this word this does not include actresses/actors who are older than 16 playing the role of a child or a younger teenager. At least this is the way I understand this forum.
But it is true: We really stated it differently in our posting rules some years ago.
For this reason I (we) will be more tolerant in the future. It will always depend on the posted movie. Movies with adult actresses/actors who don't look like a child or a younger teenager will still go to the Off-Topic forum. And this doesn't mean it's a bad movie or that we don't like your post. The content just doesn't fit for FLM.
But it is true: We really stated it differently in our posting rules some years ago.
I really didn't remember this wording. It's been a while since I last read our posting rules.'Children' includes kids up to the age of 16. Many children's roles are played by actors or actresses older than that, but if the characters they play are 16 or younger, that's acceptable.
For this reason I (we) will be more tolerant in the future. It will always depend on the posted movie. Movies with adult actresses/actors who don't look like a child or a younger teenager will still go to the Off-Topic forum. And this doesn't mean it's a bad movie or that we don't like your post. The content just doesn't fit for FLM.
Re: [REL] Sex ding (2017) [Netherlands]
Yeah I think that’s why I thought about it this way as well, I once read the old rules and it stuck in my head.ghost wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:30 pm FLM has always been a forum where we share movies with child actors. By the meaning of this word this does not include actresses/actors who are older than 16 playing the role of a child or a younger teenager. At least this is the way I understand this forum.
But it is true: We really stated it differently in our posting rules some years ago.I really didn't remember this wording. It's been a while since I last read our posting rules.'Children' includes kids up to the age of 16. Many children's roles are played by actors or actresses older than that, but if the characters they play are 16 or younger, that's acceptable.
For this reason I (we) will be more tolerant in the future. It will always depend on the posted movie. Movies with adult actresses/actors who don't look like a child or a younger teenager will still go to the Off-Topic forum. And this doesn't mean it's a bad movie or that we don't like your post. The content just doesn't fit for FLM.
Either way, it doesn’t matter too much to me because if it’s in the off topic Forum it is still on the forum anyways